Access reviews
Reviews that close. Evidence that exports.
Review campaigns scoped to what matters. Reviewers see only what's theirs. Completion is tracked centrally. Decisions trigger revocations through the same provisioning engine that granted access. Exportable artifacts for the audit cycle. No more "we sent the spreadsheet in February" theater.
Review campaign overview — scope, reviewers, completion
Campaign dashboard: scope summary, per-reviewer completion, decisions made, revocations triggered.
Campaign lifecycle
A campaign, start to finish.
-
Scope.
Choose the population — users, resources, entitlements — and the cadence. Campaign owner gets a single dashboard of what's in scope, who's responsible, and where the campaign stands.
-
Reviewer assignment.
Reviewers receive a scoped queue — only the access they're responsible for attesting to. Re-assignment is supported when ownership changes mid-campaign, so the campaign keeps moving instead of stalling on a single inbox.
-
Decisions.
Reviewer acts on each item: keep, revoke, flag. Revocations produce provisioning operations through the standard pipeline — with the same per-step journal, the same retry semantics, the same audit trail as any other change.
-
Close-out.
The owner sees completion per reviewer, decisions made, and revocations triggered. Export produces a campaign artifact: scope, reviewer list, per-item decisions, and the provisioning operations that followed.
Accountability by design
Why campaigns actually close.
Completion is a product of UX and accountability. Reviewers see only what's theirs — no 400-row spreadsheet, no context-switching across tools. Owners see who hasn't completed, so nudges go to the right people. And because revocations flow through the same provisioning engine that handled the original grant, "decided to revoke" becomes "actually revoked" — with evidence — instead of a ticket lingering in someone else's queue.
Artifact, not reconstruction
Evidence that exports.
Every campaign produces an exportable artifact — scope, reviewer list, per-reviewer completion, per-item decisions, and the provisioning operations triggered. The artifact lands alongside the rest of the audit evidence: the execution journal, the versioned state per assignment, the approval provenance. When the auditor asks what changed and why, the answer is a record, not a reconstruction.
Review campaign artifact — scope, decisions, revocations
Campaign export artifact: scope, per-reviewer completion, decisions, and the provisioning operations that followed.
Bring a real attestation cycle.
Early access is open. Show us a cadence you've struggled to complete and we'll walk through how Owlie runs it.